How they write tells you how to write to them.

Prompt 3.1 — DISC profile from their content

`Here are 10 recent LinkedIn posts from a prospect: [paste]

Build a DISC behavioral profile:

• Dominant style (D, I, S, or C)
• Secondary style
• How they make decisions (fast/slow, data/gut, consensus/solo)
• What gets their attention (status, results, relationships, precision)
• What turns them off instantly

Then give me a one-line writing instruction for how to message this specific person.`

What this replaces: Your team writing every message in their own voice and wondering why reply rates vary wildly.

Good output looks like: A specific writing instruction like "lead with data, no emojis, skip pleasantries" — not a personality horoscope.

Prompt 3.2 — Detect the communication tone they expect

`Based on these posts: [paste]

Match the prospect's expected reply tone on a scale:

• Formality (1 = buddy, 5 = boardroom)
• Density (1 = one-liner, 5 = detailed)
• Energy (1 = calm, 5 = punchy)

Give me three numbers and one example sentence written in exactly that register.`

What this replaces: Guessing whether to write formal or casual.

Good output looks like: Three numbers plus a sentence that actually matches them.

Prompt 3.3 — Find their trigger topics

`From these posts: [paste last 15 posts]

What are the 3 topics this person clearly has strong opinions about? What position do they take on each?

Then tell me: which of those topics could I reference in outreach without it feeling like I'm sucking up? Which ones should I avoid because they're clearly tired of talking about them?`

What this replaces: Generic "great post!" comments and tone-deaf references.

Good output looks like: Three topics with their actual stated positions, plus honest filtering on which to reference.

Prompt 3.4 — Spot the fake-humble brag and use it

`Here are the prospect's recent posts: [paste]

Find one accomplishment they're clearly proud of but phrased modestly. Then draft a 15-word message that acknowledges it without being sycophantic.`

What this replaces: Messages that either ignore their wins or sound like flattery.

Good output looks like: A short, dry compliment that lands because it's specific. Not "amazing work!"