Three frameworks. Use the one that matches the prospect, not the one you feel like using.
`Prospect: [summary] Their likely pain (based on role and stage): [pain point]
Write a 4-line Pain-Led first message:
No greeting. No sign-off. Under 500 characters total.`
What this replaces: "Hi [name], hope you're doing well! I wanted to reach out because..."
Good output looks like: A message that a prospect could read in 10 seconds and immediately know if it's relevant.
`Prospect: [summary] Their content themes: [from research] Free resource I can share: [name it — guide, template, data, tool]
Write a Value-Led first message:
Under 400 characters.`
What this replaces: The "I'd love to share a case study!" pitch that everyone ignores.
Good output looks like: A message where the value is obvious and the ask is tiny.
`Prospect: [summary] My angle: [specific stat, data point, or counterintuitive insight from our work]
Write an Authority-Led first message:
Under 500 characters.`
What this replaces: Trying to sound impressive with vague claims.
Good output looks like: A message that earns attention in line 1 and justifies it in line 3.
`Prospect: [name + role + summary] Their behavioral profile: [from Section 3] Their current priority: [from research]
Which framework fits this prospect best — Pain-Led, Value-Led, or Authority-Led?
Give me:
What this replaces: Your team using the same framework for every prospect regardless of fit.
Good output looks like: A confident pick with a reason tied to something specific about the prospect.