Most teams don't follow up enough. Some follow up too much. Both lose pipeline.

Prompt 6.1 — Design a 4-touch follow-up

`Prospect situation: [connected but hasn't replied to first message] First message I sent: [paste] Their profile + recent activity: [paste]

Design a 4-touch follow-up sequence:

• Touch 2 (Day 4): different angle, shorter
• Touch 3 (Day 10): drop value, no ask
• Touch 4 (Day 18): direct breakup message
• Stop rules: conditions under which I should drop them from sequence even before touch 4

Each message under 300 characters.`

What this replaces: The "just following up!" spiral.

Good output looks like: Four distinct angles, not the same message reworded. Plus clear stop rules.

Prompt 6.2 — Breakup message that actually works

`Draft a breakup message for a prospect who's gone silent.

Rules:

• Acknowledge the silence without guilt-tripping
• Make it easy for them to say "not now" or "not ever"
• Leave the door open without begging
• Under 250 characters

Give me 3 variants at different tones: dry, warm, direct.`

What this replaces: "I'll assume this isn't a priority and close your file 👋" (please stop).

Good output looks like: Three short messages that sound like a human gracefully exiting, not a passive-aggressive salesperson.

Prompt 6.3 — Detect soft "no" vs. real "no"

`Prospect reply: [paste their message]

Classify this reply:

• Hard no (stop all follow-up, thank them, close out)
• Soft no (keep in nurture, revisit in 90 days)
• Neutral (not a no, just busy — follow up in 2 weeks)
• Hidden yes (they're warming up, advance the conversation)

Give me the classification, the signal that tells you, and one suggested next action.`

What this replaces: Treating every "not right now" as a real no, or every real no as a "not right now."

Good output looks like: A clear classification with the specific phrase that gave it away.

Prompt 6.4 — Re-engage a 90-day-old soft no

`Prospect: [name + context] Their original soft no: [paste their old reply] What's changed since: [in our product, their company, or the market]

Draft a re-engagement message that references the time gap honestly, names what's changed, and doesn't pretend the last conversation didn't happen.

Under 400 characters.`

What this replaces: "Hi [name], circling back on this!" (they remember, you're not fooling anyone).

Good output looks like: A message that acknowledges the gap and gives a real reason the timing is different now.