Most inboxes have pipeline buried in them. Claude finds it.
`Here are today's LinkedIn inbox replies: [paste 10-30 replies]
For each:
Format as a table. Sort by priority.`
What this replaces: Your team scrolling through 50 replies in random order and missing the hot ones.
Good output looks like: A triaged table that tells your team exactly what to work on first.
`Active LinkedIn conversations: [paste the last message from each, with context]
Score each conversation 1-10 on likelihood to close in the next 60 days. For each:
Format as a ranked list.`
What this replaces: "How's pipeline looking?" conversations that end with "uh, let me pull that up."
Good output looks like: A ranked list with specific next moves — not "follow up."
`Here are conversations I've had on LinkedIn in the last 90 days where the last message was from me and they didn't reply: [paste]
Identify the 5 most worth re-engaging. For each:
Skip anyone who clearly isn't interested.`
What this replaces: Pipeline going cold that should have been re-engaged.
Good output looks like: Five specific names with specific reasons, not a generic "follow up with everyone" list.
`Here's a week of LinkedIn inbox activity: [paste summary or key replies]
Give me a 5-bullet executive summary:
What this replaces: The weekly pipeline review prep.
Good output looks like: Five bullets you could forward to your VP and not get follow-up questions.