Every reply needs a different response. Claude sorts them fast.
`Prospect reply: [paste] Context (what I sent, who they are): [paste]
Classify the reply by intent:
For each: the signal, the suggested response length, and the tone to match.`
What this replaces: Writing elaborate replies to "thanks, not interested."
Good output looks like: A clean classification that matches how SalesRobot can route the conversation.
`Hot reply: [paste] My goal: [book a call / get on their calendar / get specifics]
Draft a response that:
No "great to hear from you!" opener.`
What this replaces: Writing paragraph-long replies to "yes let's talk" and losing momentum.
Good output looks like: A short, specific, booking-focused reply that closes the loop.
`Prospect objection: [paste their exact words] Our actual answer to this objection: [truth — not marketing-speak]
Draft a reply that:
Under 400 characters.`
What this replaces: Defensive or dodgy objection handling.
Good output looks like: A reply that sounds like a confident peer, not a rep protecting their commission.
`Prospect reply: "Can you send me more info?"
I know this is often a soft brush-off. Draft a response that:
Under 250 characters.`
What this replaces: Sending generic decks to dead leads.
Good output looks like: A short reply that qualifies before it delivers.